[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14617545#comment-14617545
]
Tyler Hobbs commented on CASSANDRA-6477:
----------------------------------------
bq. I'm considering doing subsequent reviews as a branch I push to github
w/comments inline (similar to what Benedict's been doing lately) with feedback
as putting this quantity of feedback in Jira comments is a burden for both you
and I - thoughts?
We should probably discuss this on the dev ML, but here are my thoughts. It's
way more convenient to comment on Github, _but_, it's also nice to keep the
discussion in Jira so that it's easier to understand past design decisions when
you look at tickets. Maybe there's a nice middle-ground?
> Materialized Views (was: Global Indexes)
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6477
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: API, Core
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
> Labels: cql
> Fix For: 3.0 beta 1
>
> Attachments: test-view-data.sh
>
>
> Local indexes are suitable for low-cardinality data, where spreading the
> index across the cluster is a Good Thing. However, for high-cardinality
> data, local indexes require querying most nodes in the cluster even if only a
> handful of rows is returned.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
