[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14630030#comment-14630030
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-8963:
-------------------------------------

No worries. While I think of it, since I'm writing the small patch we need for 
3.0, I have come up with a good name for the MultiPhaseOp: (Op)?PhaseJumper, 
with a corresponding jump method.

> Make OpOrder more intuitive
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8963
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8963
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Benedict
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> There has been plenty of feedback about OpOrder being unintuitive. As well as 
> revisiting the naming, I propose to introduce an Action object with RAII 
> (AutoCloseable) protection that should be more obvious to users of the API. 
> We can also then protect this by a Ref instance for use cases where the 
> action lifetime is illdefined, and perhaps also introduce some checks for 
> actions whose lifetimes extend beyond a sensible limit to report those where 
> the object reference is retained.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to