[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12975090#action_12975090
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-1585:
-------------------------------------------
what if we named the files by cfid instead of cfname? we already have a
name->id mapping in the system tables somewhere. (and we can assume nothing in
"system" keyspace gets renamed, of course. otherwise i think we might have a
chicken/egg problem.)
> Schema change with compaction race
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1585
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1585
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Stu Hood
> Assignee: Gary Dusbabek
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.7.1
>
>
> We observed what appeared to be a race between an ongoing compaction and a
> system_drop_cf call. The destination SSTable of the compaction was not
> removed by the drop, so it remained in the data directory. Recreating a CF of
> the same name caused the SSTable to become active again (or to at least show
> in the gossiped load).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
