[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14631743#comment-14631743
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-9705:
---------------------------------------------

I've pushed an additional commit to the branch that refactor the {{Reader}} in 
{{SSTableIterator}} and {{SSTableReverseIterator}}. The new implementations 
directly return the reader for the {{slice}} method, but more generally avoid 
pretty much all the code duplication there was (and is simpler/cleaner as a 
result).

bq. There are some unused imports around the place

Forgot to answer that one. I don't know a good way to find those imports that 
are unused due to this patch (and looking manually is not very fun), so if 
we're good with it, I propose to just run an import reorganization on the 
project on commit.

> Simplify some of 8099's concrete implementations
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9705
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9705
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>             Fix For: 3.0 beta 1
>
>
> As mentioned in the ticket comments, some of the concrete implementations 
> (for Cell, Row, Clustering, PartitionUpdate, ...) of the initial patch for 
> CASSANDRA-8099 are more complex than they should be (the use of flyweight is 
> typically probably ill-fitted), which probably has performance consequence. 
> This ticket is to track the refactoring/simplifying those implementation 
> (mainly by removing the use of flyweights and simplifying accordingly).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to