[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14646445#comment-14646445
 ] 

Joshua McKenzie edited comment on CASSANDRA-6477 at 7/29/15 5:19 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Only feedback I have on the last few commits is very minor: Not sure we need 
the clause in AlterMaterializedViewStatement to check for meta.isCounter() && 
TTL since we don't allow counters with MV, do we?

I don't have any other outstanding concerns w/the patch for an alpha commit at 
this time. Given the ease and elegance w/which this last round of additions was 
made I think we're in a pretty good place to respond to feedback from alpha 
testing on this.


was (Author: joshuamckenzie):
Only feedback I have on the last few commits is very minor: Not sure we need 
the clause in AlterMaterializedViewStatement to check for meta.isCounter() && 
TTL since we don't allow counters with MV, do we?

I don't have any other outstanding concerns w/the patch for an alpha commit at 
this time. Given the ease and elegance w/which this last rounds of additions 
was made, I think we're in a pretty good place to respond to feedback from 
alpha testing on this.

> Materialized Views (was: Global Indexes)
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6477
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6477
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: API, Core
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
>              Labels: cql
>             Fix For: 3.0 alpha 1
>
>         Attachments: test-view-data.sh, users.yaml
>
>
> Local indexes are suitable for low-cardinality data, where spreading the 
> index across the cluster is a Good Thing.  However, for high-cardinality 
> data, local indexes require querying most nodes in the cluster even if only a 
> handful of rows is returned.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to