[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14653834#comment-14653834
 ] 

Marcus Olsson commented on CASSANDRA-5220:
------------------------------------------

Thanks, I've managed to get the dtests up and running now!

I had some problem running the dtests, but I think there might have been two 
small misses with the rebase. So the dtests are now working properly with 
[this|https://github.com/emolsson/cassandra/commits/5220] patch and when running
{noformat}
PRINT_DEBUG=True nosetests -s -v 
repair_test.py:TestRepair.simple_parallel_repair_test
{noformat}
on both trunk and the patched trunk I see an improvement from ~14.2s to ~6.7s 
repair time, and without vnodes(but with the patch) it was ~2s.

> Repair improvements when using vnodes
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-5220
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5220
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0 beta 1
>            Reporter: Brandon Williams
>            Assignee: Marcus Olsson
>              Labels: performance, repair
>         Attachments: 5220-yourkit.png, 5220-yourkit.tar.bz2, 
> cassandra-3.0-5220-1.patch, cassandra-3.0-5220-2.patch, 
> cassandra-3.0-5220.patch
>
>
> Currently when using vnodes, repair takes much longer to complete than 
> without them.  This appears at least in part because it's using a session per 
> range and processing them sequentially.  This generates a lot of log spam 
> with vnodes, and while being gentler and lighter on hard disk deployments, 
> ssd-based deployments would often prefer that repair be as fast as possible.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to