[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14660218#comment-14660218
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis edited comment on CASSANDRA-9927 at 8/7/15 4:23 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm okay with either "require explicit grants" or "always validate against base 
table" for 3.0.  So let's go with the latter.


was (Author: jbellis):
I'm okay with either "require explicit grants" or "always validate against base 
table" for 3.0.

> Security for MaterializedViews
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9927
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: T Jake Luciani
>              Labels: materializedviews
>             Fix For: 3.0 beta 1
>
>
> We need to think about how to handle security wrt materialized views. Since 
> they are based on a source table we should possibly inherit the same security 
> model as that table.  
> However I can see cases where users would want to create different security 
> auth for different views.  esp once we have CASSANDRA-9664 and users can 
> filter out sensitive data.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to