[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14693529#comment-14693529
]
Ariel Weisberg commented on CASSANDRA-9237:
-------------------------------------------
Having a separate socket is fine, but then we are shifting the head of line
blocking issue to user requests. That is preferable to having issues with
gossip of course.
The issue with three sockets is that without an NIO implementation of
intra-cluster messaging it means another set of threads and buffers.
I am fine with putting gossip on a dedicated socket and having only two
sockets. [~benedict] Does that work for you?
> Gossip messages subject to head of line blocking by other intra-cluster
> traffic
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9237
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9237
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ariel Weisberg
> Assignee: Ariel Weisberg
> Fix For: 3.0.0 rc1
>
>
> Reported as an issue over less than perfect networks like VPNs between data
> centers.
> Gossip goes over the small message socket where small is 64k which isn't
> particularly small. This is done for performance to keep most traffic on one
> hot socket.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
