[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14711328#comment-14711328
]
Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-9673:
----------------------------------------------
To quote Carl, "I'm not sure if the BL needed to be separated since the MV were
moved off; it probably isn't a problem now that we don't do remote replica
batchlog".
I'll rebase on top of the latest 3.0 and see if this is still an issue, but let
me second that I'm extremely not fond of a new stage just for BL writes.
> Improve batchlog write path
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9673
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9673
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Assignee: Stefania
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 3.0 beta 2
>
> Attachments: 9673_001.tar.gz, 9673_004.tar.gz,
> gc_times_first_node_patched_004.png, gc_times_first_node_trunk_004.png
>
>
> Currently we allocate an on-heap {{ByteBuffer}} to serialize the batched
> mutations into, before sending it to a distant node, generating unnecessary
> garbage (potentially a lot of it).
> With materialized views using the batchlog, it would be nice to optimise the
> write path:
> - introduce a new verb ({{Batch}})
> - introduce a new message ({{BatchMessage}}) that would encapsulate the
> mutations, expiration, and creation time (similar to {{HintMessage}} in
> CASSANDRA-6230)
> - have MS serialize it directly instead of relying on an intermediate buffer
> To avoid merely shifting the temp buffer to the receiving side(s) we should
> change the structure of the batchlog table to use a list or a map of
> individual mutations.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
