[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14716596#comment-14716596
]
Stefania commented on CASSANDRA-10109:
--------------------------------------
bq. but I'd prefer we harden our clients to missing files, since that's always
going to be a risk.
OK
bq. I mean the startup procedure that cleans up transaction logs.
That's already separate from listing files, see
{{TransactionLogs.removeUnfinishedLeftovers()}}, nothing to do with
{{Transaction.FileLister}}.
bq. We should probably enforce that, by making the class package-private,
commenting this fact, and ensuring any behaviour is accessed through LT.
{{SSTableReader}} needs the tidier. We need to find a place for the tidier to
make it package private. Shall I move it to LT?
> Windows dtest 3.0: ttl_test.py failures
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10109
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10109
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Joshua McKenzie
> Assignee: Stefania
> Labels: Windows
> Fix For: 3.0.0 rc1
>
>
> ttl_test.py:TestTTL.update_column_ttl_with_default_ttl_test2
> ttl_test.py:TestTTL.update_multiple_columns_ttl_test
> ttl_test.py:TestTTL.update_single_column_ttl_test
> Errors locally are different than CI from yesterday. Yesterday on CI we have
> timeouts and general node hangs. Today on all 3 tests when run locally I see:
> {noformat}
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "c:\src\cassandra-dtest\dtest.py", line 532, in tearDown
> raise AssertionError('Unexpected error in %s node log: %s' % (node.name,
> errors))
> AssertionError: Unexpected error in node1 node log: ['ERROR [main] 2015-08-17
> 16:53:43,120 NoSpamLogger.java:97 - This platform does not support atomic
> directory streams (SecureDirectoryStream); race conditions when loading
> sstable files could occurr']
> {noformat}
> This traces back to the commit for CASSANDRA-7066 today by [~Stefania] and
> [~benedict]. Stefania - care to take this ticket and also look further into
> whether or not we're going to have issues with 7066 on Windows? That error
> message certainly *sounds* like it's not a good thing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
