[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14744082#comment-14744082
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-10327:
--------------------------------------

As [~tjake] points out 
[here|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10326?focusedCommentId=14744064&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14744064],
 it's entirely possible this is caused by 2.1 failing part way through the 
write load.

> Performance regression in 2.2
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10327
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10327
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>             Fix For: 2.2.2
>
>
> Related to CASSANDRA-10326, one of the read-only workloads _appears_ to show 
> a regression in 2.2, however it is possible this is simply down to a 
> different compaction result (this shouldn't be very likely given the use of 
> LCS, though, and that we wait for compaction to acquiesce, and while the 
> different is not consistent across both runs, it is consistently worse).
> The query is looking up the last item of a partition.
> [run1|http://cstar.datastax.com/graph?stats=f0a17292-5a13-11e5-847a-42010af0688f&metric=op_rate&operation=3_user&smoothing=1&show_aggregates=true&xmin=0&xmax=155.43&ymin=0&ymax=13777.5]
> [run2|http://cstar.datastax.com/graph?stats=e25aaaa0-5a13-11e5-ae0d-42010af0688f&metric=op_rate&operation=3_user&smoothing=1&show_aggregates=true&xmin=0&xmax=74.36&ymin=0&ymax=34078]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to