[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14803295#comment-14803295
]
Robert Stupp commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
------------------------------------------
I'd appreciate this very much as we "convert" a lot between CQL types and
_AbstractType_.
IMO we have to do this anyway in the (more or less) near future - and this (as
schema tables are changed for 3.0) is a good chance to do it.
As soon as AbstractType is no longer used in the schema tables, we are free to
"streamline" the code and remove AbstractType completely (as soon as Thrift is
gone).
> Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of
> fully-qualified internal class names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Labels: client-impacting
> Fix For: 3.0.x
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return
> types, and UDT components.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
