[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14900847#comment-14900847
]
Marcus Eriksson commented on CASSANDRA-10280:
---------------------------------------------
[~jjirsa] I am
[~jshook], [~Bj0rn] [~anissinen] wdyt? The idea is that when we limit window
sizes we will naturally stop compacting old windows - unless we really have to
(like after a bootstrap for example), keeping max_sstable_age_days is mostly
pointless.
> Make DTCS work well with old data
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10280
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10280
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
> Fix For: 3.x, 2.1.x, 2.2.x
>
>
> Operational tasks become incredibly expensive if you keep around a long
> timespan of data with DTCS - with default settings and 1 year of data, the
> oldest window covers about 180 days. Bootstrapping a node with vnodes with
> this data layout will force cassandra to compact very many sstables in this
> window.
> We should probably put a cap on how big the biggest windows can get. We could
> probably default this to something sane based on max_sstable_age (ie, say we
> can reasonably handle 1000 sstables per node, then we can calculate how big
> the windows should be to allow that)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
