[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14903314#comment-14903314
]
Steven Warren edited comment on CASSANDRA-4386 at 9/23/15 2:43 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
I am fine with unordered rows for the IN clause, the current alternative with
parallel queries also returns unordered results. I don't have a use case for
the other operators, but assume that would be fine vs the alternative of not
being supported.
EDIT: Wouldn't the results come back in secondary index order though?
was (Author: swarren):
I am fine with unordered rows for the IN clause, the current alternative with
parallel queries also returns unordered results. I don't have a use case for
the other operators, but assume that would be fine vs the alternative of not
being supported.
> Allow cql to use the IN syntax on secondary index values
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-4386
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4386
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Jeremy Hanna
> Assignee: Benjamin Lerer
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: cql
>
> Currently CQL has a syntax for using IN to get a set of rows with a set of
> keys. This would also be very helpful for use with columns with secondary
> indexes on them. Such as:
> {code}
> select * from users where first_name in ('françois','frank');
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
