[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14954884#comment-14954884
]
Jorge Bay commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
---------------------------------------
I agree: if the goal is to hide implementation details, can we come up with a
new notation for UDT that provides name, keyspace and fields, without the need
to resolve UDT based on a name?
> Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of
> fully-qualified internal class names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Labels: client-impacting
> Fix For: 3.0.0 rc2
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return
> types, and UDT components.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
