Sylvain Lebresne created CASSANDRA-10558:
--------------------------------------------

             Summary: Fix out-of-order scrub test
                 Key: CASSANDRA-10558
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10558
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Sub-task
            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
            Assignee: Yuki Morishita
             Fix For: 3.0.0


This is kind of a followup of CASSANDRA-9880.

As the name imply, the out-of-order scrub test 
({{ScrubTest.testScrubOutOfOrder}}) test scrubs detects a sstable with 
out-of-order partitions, which imply we have a generated sstable with out of 
order partitions. That latter part being not trivial since we have a sanity 
check in {{BigTableWriter}} that we never write out-of-order partitions. And 
hence, generating such a sstable used to be manual: you had to comment the 
check in {{BigTableWriter}} and uncomment some code in {{ScrubTest}} to 
generate the sstable. That did imply you had to manually regenerate the sstable 
each time the sstable format was changed.

I had do to such manipulation in CASSANDRA-9705 (as there was some change to 
the sstable format) and unfortunately I screwed up and included the 
uncommenting of the sanity check in {{BigTableWriter}} in the commit.

In the meantime, came CASSANDRA-9880, which aimed to make the manual process of 
generating out-of-order sstable automatic. Unfortunately, that ticket was done 
with the {{BigTableWriter}} sanity check commented, which did make things a lot 
easier for the test, but was kind of wrong.

So anyway, commenting the check in {{BigTableWriter}} was an oversight and I 
uncommented it on the cassandra-3.0/trunk branches. The problem is that 
{{ScrubTest.testScrubOutOfOrder}} now fails due to that check. We need to find 
a way to make that test work without disabling our sanity check on writes. Not 
sure what's the best solution though to be honest. Maybe we'll need a flag in 
{{BigTableWriter}} to disable that check just for the test?




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to