[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10572?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14982727#comment-14982727
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-10572:
----------------------------------------------

bq. We can just short-circuit it for {{ClusteringIndexNamesFilter}} and 
{{queryNeitherCountersNorCollections()}} in certain conditions.

I don't think I understand what your suggestion is (though I doubt I'll be a 
fan of a method named {{queryNeitherCountersNorCollections}}).

> SinglePartitionNamesCommand::canRemoveRow omits counter cells it shouldn't
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10572
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10572
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>
> Like with collections, we can never be sure we've exhausted all the sstables 
> when reducing the filter. The sstables can contain legacy local shards that 
> need to be summed up. Unless we look into the content of the cells (?), or 
> until we get rid of the pre-2.1 values, we must include all the sstables in 
> the read (so long as clusterings overlap).
> This was not an issue with 2.1/2.2 as we've forced {{collectAllData}} always 
> on that path, but now we don't, and {{SinglePartitionNamesCommand}} should 
> handle the case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to