[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15037511#comment-15037511
 ] 

Marcus Eriksson commented on CASSANDRA-10718:
---------------------------------------------

bq. Shall I change the getValue() method (and call hierarchy) to return a 
Map<KeyspaceName, Map<tablename, pendingTasksValue>> 
You should probably add a new jmx method for this - I bet many operators graph 
the current pending compactions jmx value and we don't want to break that.

> Group pending compactions based on table
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-10718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10718
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
>            Assignee: Tushar Agrawal
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: lhf
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Currently we only give a global number on how many compactions are pending, 
> we should group this on a per-table basis, example:
> {code}
> $ nodetool compactionstats
> pending tasks:
> - keyspace1.standard1: 10
> - other_ks.table: 2
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to