[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15109648#comment-15109648
]
Carl Yeksigian commented on CASSANDRA-10979:
--------------------------------------------
I've rebased and pushed up new 2.2-trunk branches.
||2.2||3.0||3.3||trunk||
|[branch|https://github.com/carlyeks/cassandra/tree/ticket/10979/2.2]|[branch|https://github.com/carlyeks/cassandra/tree/ticket/10979/3.0]|[branch|https://github.com/carlyeks/cassandra/tree/ticket/10979/3.3]|[branch|https://github.com/carlyeks/cassandra/tree/ticket/10979/trunk]|
|[utest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-2.2-testall/]|[utest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-3.0-testall/]|[utest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-3.3-testall/]|[utest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-trunk-testall/]|
|[dtest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-2.2-dtest/]|[dtest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-3.0-dtest/]|[dtest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-3.3-dtest/]|[dtest|http://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/carlyeks/job/carlyeks-ticket-10979-trunk-dtest/]|
> LCS doesn't do L0 STC on new tables while an L0->L1 compaction is in progress
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10979
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10979
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Compaction
> Environment: 2.1.11 / 4.8.3 DSE.
> Reporter: Jeff Ferland
> Assignee: Carl Yeksigian
> Labels: compaction, leveled
> Fix For: 2.2.x, 3.0.x, 3.x
>
> Attachments: 10979-2.1.txt
>
>
> Reading code from
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/cassandra-2.1/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/db/compaction/LeveledManifest.java
> and comparing with behavior shown in
> https://gist.github.com/autocracy/c95aca6b00e42215daaf, the following happens:
> Score for L1,L2,and L3 is all < 1 (paste shows 20/10 and 200/100, due to
> incremental repair).
> Relevant code from here is
> if (Sets.intersection(l1overlapping, compacting).size() > 0)
> return Collections.emptyList();
> Since there will be overlap between what is compacting and L1 (in my case,
> pushing over 1,000 tables in to L1 from L0 SCTS), I get a pile up of 1,000
> smaller tables in L0 while awaiting the transition from L0 to L1 and destroy
> my performance.
> Requested outcome is to continue to perform SCTS on non-compacting L0 tables.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
