Sam Tunnicliffe created CASSANDRA-11159:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: SASI indexes don't switch memtable on flush
                 Key: CASSANDRA-11159
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11159
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Local Write-Read Paths
            Reporter: Sam Tunnicliffe
            Assignee: Sam Tunnicliffe
            Priority: Critical
             Fix For: 3.4


SASI maintains its own in-memory structures for indexing the contents of a base 
Memtable. On flush, these are simply discarded & replaced with an new instance, 
whilst the on disk index is built as the base memtable is flushed to SSTables. 

SASIIndex implements INotificationHandler and this switching of the index 
memtable is triggered by receipt of a MemtableRenewedNotification. In the 
original SASI implementation, one of the necessary modifications to C* was to 
emit this notification from DataTracker::switchMemtable, but this was 
overlooked when porting to 3.0. The net result is that the index memtable is 
never switched out, which eventually leads to OOME. 

Simply applying the original modification isn't entirely appropriate though, as 
it creates a window where it's possible for the index memtable to have been 
switched, but the flushwriter is yet to finish writing the new index sstables. 
During this window, index entries will be missing and query results inaccurate. 

I propose leaving Tracker::switchMemtable as is, so that INotificationConsumers 
are only notified from there when truncating, but adding similar notifications 
in Tracker::replaceFlushed, to fire after the View is updated. 

I'm leaning toward re-using MemtableRenewedNotification for this as 
semantically I don't believe there's any meaningful difference between the 
flush and truncation cases here. If anyone has a compelling argument for a new 
notification type though to distinguish the two events, I'm open to hear it.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to