[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15221473#comment-15221473
 ] 

Stefania commented on CASSANDRA-11320:
--------------------------------------

One more 
[change|https://github.com/stef1927/cassandra/commit/59bb8ee6e6348ec96103c89117c3ae1060b68403]
 to fix a [flacky 
test|http://cassci.datastax.com/job/stef1927-11320-3.0-dtest/3/testReport/junit/junit/cqlsh_tests.cqlsh_copy_tests/CqlshCopyTest/test_reading_max_parse_errors/].

> Improve backoff policy for cqlsh COPY FROM
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11320
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11320
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Tools
>            Reporter: Stefania
>            Assignee: Stefania
>              Labels: doc-impacting
>             Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.x
>
>
> Currently we have an exponential back-off policy in COPY FROM that kicks in 
> when timeouts are received. However there are two limitations:
> * it does not cover new requests and therefore we may not back-off 
> sufficiently to give time to an overloaded server to recover
> * the pause is performed in the receiving thread and therefore we may not 
> process server messages quickly enough
> There is a static throttling mechanism in rows per second from feeder to 
> worker processes (the INGESTRATE) but the feeder has no idea of the load of 
> each worker process. However it's easy to keep track of how many chunks a 
> worker process has yet to read by introducing a bounded semaphore.
> The idea is to move the back-off pauses to the worker processes main thread 
> so as to include all messages, new and retries, not just the retries that 
> timed out. The worker process will not read new chunks during the back-off 
> pauses, and the feeder process can then look at the number of pending chunks 
> before sending new chunks to a worker process.
> [~aholmber], [~aweisberg] what do you think?  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to