[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15278467#comment-15278467
 ] 

Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-11432:
-----------------------------------------------

You might be right, though I don't see it as a counters problem at this point 
(and there isn't much to be done here, either, so I'll be closing the ticket).

That said, some improvements that might help here eventually:
- CASSANDRA-10862, to reduce the number of referenced sstables during reads 
after streaming, will affect the read before write portion of counter writes
- CASSANDRA-9811, when implemented, will allow to eliminate some of the 
sstables on the read-before-write path, if any sstable X has its highest 
timestamp that is lower than the last-read global shard's for the node

> Counter values become under-counted when running repair.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11432
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11432
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Dikang Gu
>            Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
>
> We are experimenting Counters in Cassandra 2.2.5. Our setup is that we have 6 
> nodes, across three different regions, and in each region, the replication 
> factor is 2. Basically, each nodes holds a full copy of the data.
> We are writing to cluster with CL = 2, and reading with CL = 1. 
> When are doing 30k/s counter increment/decrement per node, and at the 
> meanwhile, we are double writing to our mysql tier, so that we can measure 
> the accuracy of C* counter, compared to mysql.
> The experiment result was great at the beginning, the counter value in C* and 
> mysql are very close. The difference is less than 0.1%. 
> But when we start to run the repair on one node, the counter value in C* 
> become much less than the value in mysql,  the difference becomes larger than 
> 1%.
> My question is that is it a known problem that the counter value will become 
> under-counted if repair is running? Should we avoid running repair for 
> counter tables?
> Thanks. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to