[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15332356#comment-15332356
]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-8700:
---------------------------------------------
bq. I suggest not putting the generated HTML in git, but rather have it be a
build artifact like a jar would be.
That's exactly what it does currently, and I agree with the general sentiment,
but in practice our web site is managed through SVN (through some kind of
pubsub managed by the ASF) so the html will have to get there at some point
(but we push to the website rarely and without concurrency so I don't think
"it'll turn into a mess" in practice). And my mention that I'd rather have this
done with git rather than SVN is completely orthogonal to the documentation
problem, I was just rambling, let's forget about it here.
> replace the wiki with docs in the git repo
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-8700
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8700
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Documentation and Website
> Reporter: Jon Haddad
> Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 3.8
>
> Attachments: TombstonesAndGcGrace.md, bloom_filters.md,
> compression.md, contributing.zip, getting_started.zip, hardware.md
>
>
> The wiki as it stands is pretty terrible. It takes several minutes to apply
> a single update, and as a result, it's almost never updated. The information
> there has very little context as to what version it applies to. Most people
> I've talked to that try to use the information they find there find it is
> more confusing than helpful.
> I'd like to propose that instead of using the wiki, the doc directory in the
> cassandra repo be used for docs (already used for CQL3 spec) in a format that
> can be built to a variety of output formats like HTML / epub / etc. I won't
> start the bikeshedding on which markup format is preferable - but there are
> several options that can work perfectly fine. I've personally use sphinx w/
> restructured text, and markdown. Both can build easily and as an added bonus
> be pushed to readthedocs (or something similar) automatically. For an
> example, see cqlengine's documentation, which I think is already
> significantly better than the wiki:
> http://cqlengine.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
> In addition to being overall easier to maintain, putting the documentation in
> the git repo adds context, since it evolves with the versions of Cassandra.
> If the wiki were kept even remotely up to date, I wouldn't bother with this,
> but not having at least some basic documentation in the repo, or anywhere
> associated with the project, is frustrating.
> For reference, the last 3 updates were:
> 1/15/15 - updating committers list
> 1/08/15 - updating contributers and how to contribute
> 12/16/14 - added a link to CQL docs from wiki frontpage (by me)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
