[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15344339#comment-15344339
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-9779:
-------------------------------------------

Easy enough to ignore merges of the same value.  Same problem + solution in the 
case of timed-out updates that get retried.

> Append-only optimization
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9779
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9779
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: CQL
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> Many common workloads are append-only: that is, they insert new rows but do 
> not update existing ones.  However, Cassandra has no way to infer this and so 
> it must treat all tables as if they may experience updates in the future.
> If we added syntax to tell Cassandra about this ({{WITH INSERTS ONLY}} for 
> instance) then we could do a number of optimizations:
> - Compaction would only need to worry about defragmenting partitions, not 
> rows.  We could default to DTCS or similar.
> - CollationController could stop scanning sstables as soon as it finds a 
> matching row
> - Most importantly, materialized views wouldn't need to worry about deleting 
> prior values, which would eliminate the majority of the MV overhead



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to