[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15375191#comment-15375191
 ] 

Sergio Bossa commented on CASSANDRA-9318:
-----------------------------------------

[~slebresne],

bq. if we make the strategy a bit more generic as mentioned above so the 
decision is made from all replica involved (maybe the strategy should also keep 
track of the replica-state completely internally so we can implement basic 
strategy like having a simple high watermark very easy)

I'm already separating the "computation" phase from the "application", in order 
to address some previous points from my discussion with [~Stefania], so I think 
that should do it.

bq. and we make sure to not throttle too quickly (typically, if a single 
replica is slow and we don't really need it, start by just hinting him)

This can be easily implemented in the strategy itself as a parameter, i.e. 
"back-pressure cycles before actually starting to rate limit", so I'll do this 
eventually later.

> Bound the number of in-flight requests at the coordinator
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9318
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9318
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Local Write-Read Paths, Streaming and Messaging
>            Reporter: Ariel Weisberg
>            Assignee: Sergio Bossa
>         Attachments: 9318-3.0-nits-trailing-spaces.patch, backpressure.png, 
> limit.btm, no_backpressure.png
>
>
> It's possible to somewhat bound the amount of load accepted into the cluster 
> by bounding the number of in-flight requests and request bytes.
> An implementation might do something like track the number of outstanding 
> bytes and requests and if it reaches a high watermark disable read on client 
> connections until it goes back below some low watermark.
> Need to make sure that disabling read on the client connection won't 
> introduce other issues.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to