[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15504924#comment-15504924
 ] 

Aleksey Yeschenko commented on CASSANDRA-8032:
----------------------------------------------

bq. thanks for the explanation. Cassandra 4.0 is likely to be announced in the 
end of the 2016, how about multi-tenant feature?

That won't happen for a while. Requires too much rework to implement proper 
scheduling and isolation, at least with the current Cassandra execution model. 
Sorry :(

> User based request scheduler
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8032
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8032
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: mck
>            Assignee: mck
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: patch
>         Attachments: v1-0001-CASSANDRA-8032-User-based-request-scheduler.txt
>
>
> Today only a keyspace based request scheduler exists.
> Post CASSANDRA-4898 it could be possible to implement a request_scheduler 
> based on users (from system_auth.credentials) rather than keyspaces. This 
> could offer a finer granularity of control, from read-only vs read-write 
> users on keyspaces, to application dedicated vs ad-hoc users. Alternatively 
> it could also offer a granularity larger and easier to work with than per 
> keyspace.
> The request scheduler is a useful concept but i think that setups with enough 
> nodes often favour separate clusters rather than either creating separate 
> virtual datacenters or using the request scheduler. To give the request 
> scheduler another, and more flexible, implementation could especially help 
> those users that don't yet have enough nodes to warrant separate clusters, or 
> even separate virtual datacenters. On such smaller clusters cassandra can 
> still be seen as an unstable technology because poor consumers/schemas can 
> easily affect, even bring down, a whole cluster.
> I haven't look into the feasibility of this within the code, but it comes to 
> mind as rather simple, and i would be interested in offering a patch if the 
> idea carries validity.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to