[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15562870#comment-15562870
]
Edward Capriolo edited comment on CASSANDRA-7296 at 10/10/16 5:26 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think it makes sense as either but it really makes sense as a consistency
level as well.
THIS_ONE might be a better name. Other consistency levels do express WHERE you
want something to happen:
Aren't we discussing adding consistency levels here?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8119
The difference between 8119 and this is that this is implemented in a patch, so
a rational argument is to do this feature in the least intrusive way.
was (Author: appodictic):
Is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8119 a protocol option as
well?
> Add CL.COORDINATOR_ONLY
> -----------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-7296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7296
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tupshin Harper
>
> For reasons such as CASSANDRA-6340 and similar, it would be nice to have a
> read that never gets distributed, and only works if the coordinator you are
> talking to is an owner of the row.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
