[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15564760#comment-15564760
]
Alex Petrov edited comment on CASSANDRA-12733 at 10/11/16 8:36 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
CI looks good now (had to re-run trunk from my fork, although code is
identical). Also, {{CHANGES}} file is updated for 3.X (also, merges cleanly to
trunk).
|[3.X |https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra/tree/12733-3.X]
|[dtest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-3.X-testall/]
|[utest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-3.X-testall/]
|
|[trunk|https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra/tree/12733-trunk]
|[dtest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-trunk-testall/]|[utest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-trunk-testall/]|
was (Author: ifesdjeen):
CI looks good now (had to re-run trunk from my fork, although code is
identical). Also, {{CHANGES}} file is updated for 3.X.
|[3.X |https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra/tree/12733-3.X]
|[dtest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-3.X-testall/]
|[utest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-3.X-testall/]
|
|[trunk|https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra/tree/12733-trunk]
|[dtest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-trunk-testall/]|[utest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12733-trunk-testall/]|
> Throw an exception if there is a prepared statement id hash conflict.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-12733
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12733
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: CQL
> Reporter: Jeremiah Jordan
> Assignee: Jeremiah Jordan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> I seriously doubt there is any chance of actually getting two prepared
> statement strings that have the same MD5. But there should probably be
> checks in QueryProcessor.getStoredPreparedStatement that the query string of
> the statement being prepared matches the query string of the ID returned from
> the cache when one already exists there.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
