[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15585042#comment-15585042
 ] 

Alex Petrov edited comment on CASSANDRA-12373 at 10/18/16 12:31 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

[~slebresne] [~iamaleksey] do we want to support things like materialized views 
and group by? Or we just want a basic read support so that people could migrate 
from this table type?


was (Author: ifesdjeen):
[~slebresne] [~iamaleksey] do we want to also support filtering on {{column2}} 
and {{value}} for supercolumns? In {{2.x}} it wasn't supported (predicate on 
non-2i column).

Also, do we want to support things like materialized views and group by? Or we 
just want a basic read support so that people could migrate from this table 
type?

> 3.0 breaks CQL compatibility with super columns families
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-12373
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12373
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CQL
>            Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Assignee: Alex Petrov
>             Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.x
>
>
> This is a follow-up to CASSANDRA-12335 to fix the CQL side of super column 
> compatibility.
> The details and a proposed solution can be found in the comments of 
> CASSANDRA-12335 but the crux of the issue is that super column famillies show 
> up differently in CQL in 3.0.x/3.x compared to 2.x, hence breaking backward 
> compatibilty.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to