[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15591861#comment-15591861
]
Alex Petrov commented on CASSANDRA-12373:
-----------------------------------------
I've implemented a _preliminary_ version of the patch (supercolum counters are
still in progress):
|[trunk|https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra/tree/12373-trunk-squashed]|[dtest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12373-trunk-squashed-dtest/]|[utest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12373-trunk-squashed-testall/]|
|[2.2|https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra/tree/12373-2.2-squashed]|[dtest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12373-2.2-squashed-dtest/]|[utest|https://cassci.datastax.com/view/Dev/view/ifesdjeen/job/ifesdjeen-12373-2.2-squashed-testall/]|
|[dtest patch|https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cassandra-dtest/tree/12373]|
Should we include support for filtering, LWTs and materialized views? This is
going to be some additional work because of column mappings / making fake
columns available everywhere. Since we're bringing them back mostly to let
people migrate to 3.x storage, I'd suggest leaving these three pieces out. What
do you think?
> 3.0 breaks CQL compatibility with super columns families
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-12373
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12373
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: CQL
> Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
> Assignee: Alex Petrov
> Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.x
>
>
> This is a follow-up to CASSANDRA-12335 to fix the CQL side of super column
> compatibility.
> The details and a proposed solution can be found in the comments of
> CASSANDRA-12335 but the crux of the issue is that super column famillies show
> up differently in CQL in 3.0.x/3.x compared to 2.x, hence breaking backward
> compatibilty.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
