[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13001998#comment-13001998
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-2233:
-------------------------------------------
bq. I'm not sure how useful the natural order of the other UUID versions is
Agreed.
bq. don't access ByteBuffer.array() directly without asking if
ByteBuffer.hasArray() first
Yes, we have a bunch of methods in ByteBufferUtil that will use array if it
exists otherwise will either duplicate and use relative methods or use
byte-at-a-time get.
bq. write a unit test.
+1, mostly it will just need to adapt what we have in TimeUUIDTypeTeset
> Add unified UUIDType
> --------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-2233
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2233
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 0.7.3
> Reporter: Ed Anuff
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: UUIDType.java
>
>
> Unified UUIDType comparator, compares as time-based if both UUIDs are
> time-based, otherwise uses byte comparison. Based on code from the current
> LexicalUUIDType and TimeUUIDType comparers, so performance and behavior
> should be consistent and compatible.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
