[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15663766#comment-15663766
]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-10446:
----------------------------------------------
I wouldn't mind some clarification on this and incremental repair. My
understanding of incremental repair, as it's currently implemented, is that
having a sstable marked "repaired" is a global property (it means "all the
replicas have the data in that sstable"). Which means we obviously cannot mark
anything "repaired" if some node was down. This seems to be what the last patch
is doing, but some of the discussions above seems to suggest this could be done
differently in the future, after CASSANDRA-9143 in particular. Did I misread
those discussions or did I miss something more fundamental?
> Run repair with down replicas
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10446
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10446
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: sankalp kohli
> Assignee: Blake Eggleston
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> We should have an option of running repair when replicas are down. We can
> call it -force.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
