[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15663766#comment-15663766 ]
Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-10446: ---------------------------------------------- I wouldn't mind some clarification on this and incremental repair. My understanding of incremental repair, as it's currently implemented, is that having a sstable marked "repaired" is a global property (it means "all the replicas have the data in that sstable"). Which means we obviously cannot mark anything "repaired" if some node was down. This seems to be what the last patch is doing, but some of the discussions above seems to suggest this could be done differently in the future, after CASSANDRA-9143 in particular. Did I misread those discussions or did I miss something more fundamental? > Run repair with down replicas > ----------------------------- > > Key: CASSANDRA-10446 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10446 > Project: Cassandra > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: sankalp kohli > Assignee: Blake Eggleston > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 4.0 > > > We should have an option of running repair when replicas are down. We can > call it -force. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)