[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15665310#comment-15665310
 ] 

Alwyn Davis commented on CASSANDRA-12649:
-----------------------------------------

I've updated the patch - [^12649-3.x-v2.patch] based on your points.

I've also added a {{BatchBench}} JMH class and ran it against trunk, the first 
implementation of this patch and this current implementation:

*BATCH METRICS*
{noformat}o.a.c.t.m.BatchBench.batchLogged        thrpt        50        38.784 
   ± 6.790    ops/ms
o.a.c.t.m.BatchBench.batchUnlogged    thrpt        50        39.278    ± 7.572  
  ops/ms{noformat}

*BATCH METRICS (v2)*
{noformat}o.a.c.t.m.BatchBench.batchLogged        thrpt        50        40.340 
   ± 7.856    ops/ms
o.a.c.t.m.BatchBench.batchUnlogged    thrpt        50        38.198    ± 8.116  
  ops/ms{noformat}

*TRUNK*
{noformat}o.a.c.t.m.BatchBench.batchLogged        thrpt        50        38.737 
   ± 7.661    ops/ms
o.a.c.t.m.BatchBench.batchUnlogged    thrpt        50        38.455    ± 7.111  
  ops/ms{noformat}

As {{update.dataSize()}} is not checked on single partition batches, 
{{mutationSizeHistogram}} will only measure multi-partition batches.

> Add BATCH metrics
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-12649
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-12649
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Alwyn Davis
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>         Attachments: 12649-3.x-v2.patch, 12649-3.x.patch, 
> stress-batch-metrics.tar.gz, stress-trunk.tar.gz, trunk-12649.txt
>
>
> To identify causes of load on a cluster, it would be useful to have some 
> additional metrics:
> * *Mutation size distribution:* I believe this would be relevant when 
> tracking the performance of unlogged batches.
> * *Logged / Unlogged Partitions per batch distribution:* This would also give 
> a count of batch types processed. Multiple distinct tables in batch would 
> just be considered as separate partitions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to