[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nachiket Patil updated CASSANDRA-13041:
---------------------------------------
    Description: I don’t believe it is ever correct to remove a DC from the 
{code}system_auth{code} replication settings while there are nodes up in that 
DC. Cassandra should not allow this change if there are hosts which are 
currently members of the cluster in that DC, as any request which is routed to 
these hosts will meet an unavailable. Also dropping the keyspace system_auth 
should not be allowed.  (was: I don’t believe it is ever correct to remove a DC 
from the system_auth replication settings while there are nodes up in that DC. 
Cassandra should not allow this change if there are hosts which are currently 
members of the cluster in that DC, as any request which is routed to these 
hosts will meet an unavailable. Also dropping the keyspace system_auth should 
not be allowed.)

> Do not allow removal of a DC from system_auth replication settings if the DC 
> has active Cassandra instances
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-13041
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13041
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Distributed Metadata
>            Reporter: Nachiket Patil
>            Assignee: Nachiket Patil
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> I don’t believe it is ever correct to remove a DC from the 
> {code}system_auth{code} replication settings while there are nodes up in that 
> DC. Cassandra should not allow this change if there are hosts which are 
> currently members of the cluster in that DC, as any request which is routed 
> to these hosts will meet an unavailable. Also dropping the keyspace 
> system_auth should not be allowed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to