[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15892559#comment-15892559
 ] 

Ariel Weisberg commented on CASSANDRA-11471:
--------------------------------------------

* Please add a unit test for {{CommonNameCertificateAuthenticator}}
* [Only if encryption is 
optional?|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...benbromhead:11471#diff-ab99d4b775ea620e439db41d18353541R123]
 Basically because the authenticator can only work if the certificates are 
there? It seems like this can NPE?
* It seems like this adds the capability to allow you to select a mechanism, 
but the authenticators don't actually select multiple mechanisms only one is 
supported?
* {{NegotiatingSaslNegotiator.setupOnCompletedNegotiation()}} appears to have 
no implementations?
* [Debug is on all the time so this may be a bit 
much|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...benbromhead:11471#diff-ef1e335e8d51911f09bcc735b0632c5cR218]
* [Same debug 
issue|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...benbromhead:11471#diff-5c1697b2ca600e9e034b27ac03b0129dR43]
* [Same debug 
issue|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...benbromhead:11471#diff-ef1e335e8d51911f09bcc735b0632c5cR205]
* [Extra 
line|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...benbromhead:11471#diff-f4a806982d4fb565a8ceb5476cfb5978R84]
* [Extra 
line|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/compare/trunk...benbromhead:11471#diff-f4a806982d4fb565a8ceb5476cfb5978R71]

For the driver and protocol change you should create a subtask here 
https://datastax-oss.atlassian.net/browse/JAVA-1361

> Add SASL mechanism negotiation to the native protocol
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11471
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11471
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: CQL
>            Reporter: Sam Tunnicliffe
>            Assignee: Ben Bromhead
>              Labels: client-impacting
>         Attachments: CASSANDRA-11471
>
>
> Introducing an additional message exchange into the authentication sequence 
> would allow us to support multiple authentication schemes and [negotiation of 
> SASL mechanisms|https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4422#section-3.2]. 
> The current {{AUTHENTICATE}} message sent from Client to Server includes the 
> java classname of the configured {{IAuthenticator}}. This could be superceded 
> by a new message which lists the SASL mechanisms supported by the server. The 
> client would then respond with a new message which indicates it's choice of 
> mechanism.  This would allow the server to support multiple mechanisms, for 
> example enabling both {{PLAIN}} for username/password authentication and 
> {{EXTERNAL}} for a mechanism for extracting credentials from SSL 
> certificates\* (see the example in 
> [RFC-4422|https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4422#appendix-A]). Furthermore, the 
> server could tailor the list of supported mechanisms on a per-connection 
> basis, e.g. only offering certificate based auth to encrypted clients. 
> The client's response should include the selected mechanism and any initial 
> response data. This is mechanism-specific; the {{PLAIN}} mechanism consists 
> of a single round in which the client sends encoded credentials as the 
> initial response data and the server response indicates either success or 
> failure with no futher challenges required.
> From a protocol perspective, after the mechanism negotiation the exchange 
> would continue as in protocol v4, with one or more rounds of 
> {{AUTH_CHALLENGE}} and {{AUTH_RESPONSE}} messages, terminated by an 
> {{AUTH_SUCCESS}} sent from Server to Client upon successful authentication or 
> an {{ERROR}} on auth failure. 
> XMPP performs mechanism negotiation in this way, 
> [RFC-3920|http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3920#section-6] includes a good 
> overview.
> \* Note: this would require some a priori agreement between client and server 
> over the implementation of the {{EXTERNAL}} mechanism.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to