[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16397044#comment-16397044
 ] 

Benjamin Lerer edited comment on CASSANDRA-7622 at 3/13/18 2:47 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

I would simply not support any {{CREATE/ALTER/DROP}} statements for virtual 
tables and just allow them to be created internally.

Having the code robust enough without allowing any type of implementation is in 
my opinion already a nice goal.


was (Author: blerer):
I would simply not support any {{CREATE/ALTER/DROP}} statements for Virtual 
table and just allow them to be created internally.

> Implement virtual tables
> ------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7622
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7622
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tupshin Harper
>            Assignee: Chris Lohfink
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> There are a variety of reasons to want virtual tables, which would be any 
> table that would be backed by an API, rather than data explicitly managed and 
> stored as sstables.
> One possible use case would be to expose JMX data through CQL as a 
> resurrection of CASSANDRA-3527.
> Another is a more general framework to implement the ability to expose yaml 
> configuration information. So it would be an alternate approach to 
> CASSANDRA-7370.
> A possible implementation would be in terms of CASSANDRA-7443, but I am not 
> presupposing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to