[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sam Tunnicliffe updated CASSANDRA-14802:
----------------------------------------
    Test and Documentation Plan: Unit test included
                         Status: Patch Available  (was: In Progress)

> calculatePendingRanges assigns more pending ranges than necessary 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-14802
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14802
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Legacy/Coordination, Legacy/Distributed Metadata
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Sam Tunnicliffe
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> This might be a good thing, but should probably be configurable, and made 
> consistent.  Presently, in a number of circumstances where there are multiple 
> range movements, {{calculatePendingRanges}} will assign a pending range to a 
> node that will not ultimately own it.  If done consistently, this might make 
> range movements resilient to node failures / aborted range movements, since 
> all nodes will be receiving all ranges they might own under any incomplete 
> range ownership movements.  But done inconsistently it seems only to reduce 
> availability in the cluster, by potentially increasing the number of pending 
> nodes unnecessarily.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to