[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16878096#comment-16878096
]
Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-15194:
--------------------------------------
That works for tables that have a clear name, which might well be all of the
ones introduced that we're discussing. I'll try to find time to take a closer
look at all of the tables soon.
Whilst on that topic of table naming, I think some could be improved a little,
and I'd be interested to hear what you think. In particular, the latency
tables should IMO probably include {{latency}} in the name - both because it
isn't trivially obvious, and to not overly complicate future naming decisions
that cover the same category of things. {{live_scanned}} also probably has a
fairly unclear meaning to anybody not really well versed in C*.
What do you think?
> Improve readability of Table metrics Virtual tables units
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-15194
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15194
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Feature/Virtual Tables
> Reporter: Jon Haddad
> Assignee: Chris Lohfink
> Priority: Normal
>
> I just noticed this strange output in the coordinator_reads output::
> {code}
> cqlsh:system_views> select * from coordinator_reads ;
> count | keyspace_name | table_name | 99th | max |
> median | per_second
> -------+--------------------+--------------------------------+------+-----+--------+------------
> 7573 | tlp_stress | keyvalue | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 2.2375e-16
> 6076 | tlp_stress | random_access | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 7.4126e-12
> 390 | tlp_stress | sensor_data_udt | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 1.7721e-64
> 30 | system | local | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 0.006406
> 11 | system_schema | columns | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 1.1192e-16
> 11 | system_schema | indexes | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 1.1192e-16
> 11 | system_schema | tables | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 1.1192e-16
> 11 | system_schema | views | 0 | 0 |
> 0 | 1.1192e-16
> {code}
> cc [~cnlwsu]
> btw I realize the output is technically correct, but it's not very readable.
> For practical purposes this should just say 0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
