[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRASC-17?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17089934#comment-17089934
 ] 

Jon Haddad commented on CASSANDRASC-17:
---------------------------------------

I think I have the client side of things figured out.

I generated the client swagger libraries using the following and took at look 
at the source:

{noformat}
swagger-codegen generate -i api.yaml -l java -o ~/swagger-client
{noformat}

Swagger is a little weird in that it seems to originally be designed to work 
with a single endpoint, not a system like the sidecar where you may have 
hundreds of servers.  If you don't specify a top level {{servers}} block in the 
api configuration you end up with a client that doesn't know where to make 
requests.  When you create your client, I believe it has to look something like 
this:

{code}
ApiClient apiClient = new ApiClient().setBasePath("http://192.168.1.1/node/1";);
VisibilityApi api = new VisibilityApi(apiClient);
{code}

For sanity's sake you'd end up providing one VisibilityApi per Cassandra node.

I have to do a little more work to verify this and be certain, as well as 
figure out how the server would be impacted.  

> Ensure sidecar can control multiple Cassandra instances
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRASC-17
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRASC-17
>             Project: Sidecar for Apache Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Configuration
>            Reporter: Jon Haddad
>            Priority: Normal
>
> Since we can run multiple hosts per node, we should allow a single sidecar 
> process to control multiple Cassandra nodes.
> I am not sure if we should encode the id of the node in the URL or as a 
> parameter that would have to be present in every request if using > 1 node.  
> I lean towards the latter - meaning it’s a slight inconvenience for a very 
> small group, rather than messing with the URL scheme for everyone else.  I 
> don’t hold this opinion very strongly though.  I’d like to discuss before 
> doing any work here.  
> Thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to