[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17105683#comment-17105683
 ] 

David Capwell commented on CASSANDRA-15566:
-------------------------------------------

Moved out of 4.0 since these are not regressions but improvements, and these 
improvements can be done in a minor release.  The 4.0 timeline should flesh out 
a plan for how to fix and validate these changes, but should not be made in the 
4.0 timeline.

> Repair coordinator can hang under some cases
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-15566
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15566
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Consistency/Repair
>            Reporter: David Capwell
>            Assignee: David Capwell
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.x
>
>
> Repair coordination makes a few assumptions about message delivery which 
> cause it to hang forever when those assumptions don’t hold true: fire and 
> forget will not get rejected (participate has an issue and rejects the 
> message), and a very delayed message will one day be seen (messaging can be 
> dropped under load or when failure detector thinks a node is bad but is just 
> GCing).
> Given this and the desire to have better observability with repair (see 
> CASSANDRA-15399), coordination should be changed into a request/response 
> pattern (with retries) and polling (validation status and MerkleTree 
> sending).  This would allow the coordinator to detect changes in state (it 
> was known participate was working on validation, but it no longer knows about 
> the validation task), and to be able to recover from ephemeral issues.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to