[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17127079#comment-17127079
]
Surbhi Gupta commented on CASSANDRA-13810:
------------------------------------------
We have upgraded to 3.11.5 and still see the same issue.
> Overload because of hint pressure + MVs
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-13810
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13810
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Feature/Materialized Views
> Reporter: Tom van der Woerdt
> Priority: Urgent
> Labels: materializedviews
> Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.11.x, 4.x
>
>
> Cluster setup: 3 DCs, 20 Cassandra nodes each, all 3.0.14, with approx. 200GB
> data per machine. Many tables have MVs associated.
> During some maintenance we did a rolling restart of all nodes in the cluster.
> This caused a buildup of hints/batches, as expected. Most nodes came back
> just fine, except for two nodes.
> These two nodes came back with a loadavg of >100, and 'nodetool tpstats'
> showed a million (not exaggerating) MutationStage tasks per second(!). It was
> clear that these were mostly (all?) mutations coming from hints, as indicated
> by thousands of log entries per second in debug.log :
> {noformat}
> DEBUG [SharedPool-Worker-107] 2017-08-27 13:16:51,098 HintVerbHandler.java:95
> - Failed to apply hint
> java.util.concurrent.CompletionException:
> org.apache.cassandra.exceptions.WriteTimeoutException: Operation timed out -
> received only 0 responses.
> at
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.encodeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:292)
> ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.completeThrowable(CompletableFuture.java:308)
> ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.uniAccept(CompletableFuture.java:647)
> ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniAccept.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:632)
> ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.postComplete(CompletableFuture.java:474)
> ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.completeExceptionally(CompletableFuture.java:1977)
> ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> at org.apache.cassandra.db.Keyspace.applyInternal(Keyspace.java:481)
> ~[apache-cassandra-3.0.14.jar:3.0.14]
> at
> org.apache.cassandra.db.Keyspace.lambda$applyInternal$0(Keyspace.java:495)
> ~[apache-cassandra-3.0.14.jar:3.0.14]
> at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> at
> org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.AbstractLocalAwareExecutorService$FutureTask.run(AbstractLocalAwareExecutorService.java:164)
> ~[apache-cassandra-3.0.14.jar:3.0.14]
> at org.apache.cassandra.concurrent.SEPWorker.run(SEPWorker.java:105)
> ~[apache-cassandra-3.0.14.jar:3.0.14]
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) ~[na:1.8.0_144]
> Caused by: org.apache.cassandra.exceptions.WriteTimeoutException: Operation
> timed out - received only 0 responses.
> ... 6 common frames omitted
> {noformat}
> After reading the relevant code, it seems that a hint is considered
> droppable, and in the mutation path when the table contains a MV and the lock
> fails to acquire and the mutation is droppable, it throws a WTE without
> waiting until the timeout expires. This explains why Cassandra is able to
> process a million mutations per second without actually considering them
> 'dropped' in the 'nodetool tpstats' output.
> I managed to recover the two nodes by stopping handoffs on all nodes in the
> cluster and reenabling them one at a time. It's likely that the hint/batchlog
> settings were sub-optimal on this cluster, but I think that the retry
> behavior(?) of hints should be improved as it's hard to express hint
> throughput in kb/s when the mutations can involve MVs.
> More data available upon request -- I'm not sure which bits are relevant and
> which aren't.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
