[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17177109#comment-17177109
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-13994:
----------------------------------------------

Available again so did a review pass on the last version.

And that last version looks good to me. I just gathered a few last nits/minor 
suggestions in [this 
commit|https://github.com/pcmanus/cassandra/commits/C-13994-review]. Which is 
mostly cleaning a few minor things and updating/adding comments. The only 2 
real 'code changes' there are:
* in {{CassandraIndex#indexCfsMetadata}}, the leftover special case for keys 
index felt more cleanly handled now by overriding the 
{{CassandraIndexFunctions#addIndexClusteringColumns}} method, which this commit 
does.
* we were checking/throwing for unsupported flags both in {{TableMetadata}} 
ctor and in {{SchemaKeyspace#fetchTable}}, and this with different messages, 
but the latter calls the former in all cases, so I simplified a bit keeping 
only the {{TableMetadata}} ctor case.

But those are all minor suggestions so whether you keep them or not, +1 from me 
(assuming CI is still clean on this obviously).


> Remove dead compact storage code before 4.0 release
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-13994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-13994
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Legacy/Local Write-Read Paths
>            Reporter: Alex Petrov
>            Assignee: Ekaterina Dimitrova
>            Priority: Low
>             Fix For: 4.0, 4.0-beta
>
>
> 4.0 comes without thrift (after [CASSANDRA-11115]) and COMPACT STORAGE (after 
> [CASSANDRA-10857]), and since Compact Storage flags are now disabled, all of 
> the related functionality is useless.
> There are still some things to consider:
> 1. One of the system tables (built indexes) was compact. For now, we just 
> added {{value}} column to it to make sure it's backwards-compatible, but we 
> might want to make sure it's just a "normal" table and doesn't have redundant 
> columns.
> 2. Compact Tables were building indexes in {{KEYS}} mode. Removing it is 
> trivial, but this would mean that all built indexes will be defunct. We could 
> log a warning for now and ask users to migrate off those for now and 
> completely remove it from future releases. It's just a couple of classes 
> though.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to