[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17212674#comment-17212674
 ] 

Michael Semb Wever commented on CASSANDRA-16201:
------------------------------------------------

[~marcuse], looking at CASSANDRA-15430 it looks like {{initialCapacity}} 
(CASSANDRA-13929) needs to be back-ported to 3.0, and this ticket also applied 
to 3.0. wdyt?

> Cassandra 4.0 b2 - OOM / memory pressure due to object array pre-allocations 
> in BatchUpdatesCollector
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16201
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16201
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Local/Other
>            Reporter: Thomas Steinmaurer
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 3.11.x, 4.0-beta
>
>         Attachments: screenshot-1.png, screenshot-2.png
>
>
> In a Cas 2.1 / 3.0 / 3.11 / 4.0b2 comparison test with the same load profile, 
> we see 4.0b2 going OOM from time to time. According to a heap dump, we have 
> multiple NTR threads in a 3-digit MB range.
> This is likely related to object array pre-allocations at the size of 
> {{BatchUpdatesCollector.updatedRows}} per {{BTree}} although there is always 
> only 1 {{BTreeRow}} in the {{BTree}}.
>  !screenshot-1.png! 
> So it seems we have many, many 20K elemnts pre-allocated object arrays 
> resulting in a shallow heap of 80K each, although there is only one element 
> in the array.
> This sort of pre-allocation is causing a lot of memory pressure.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to