Caleb Rackliffe created CASSANDRA-16226:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: COMPACT STORAGE SSTables created before 3.0 are not 
correctly skipped by timestamp due to missing primary key liveness info
                 Key: CASSANDRA-16226
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16226
             Project: Cassandra
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Legacy/Local Write-Read Paths
            Reporter: Caleb Rackliffe


This was discovered while tracking down a spike in the number of  SSTables per 
read for a COMPACT STORAGE table after a 2.1 -> 3.0 upgrade. Before 3.0, there 
is no direct analog of 3.0's primary key liveness info. When we upgrade 2.1 
COMPACT STORAGE SSTables to the mf format, we simply don't write row 
timestamps, even if the original mutations were INSERTs. On read, when we look 
at SSTables in order from newest to oldest max timestamp, we expect to have 
this primary key liveness information to determine whether we can skip older 
SSTables after finding completely populated rows.

ex. I have three SSTables in a COMPACT STORAGE table with max timestamps 1000, 
2000, and 3000. There are many rows in a particular partition, making filtering 
on the min and max clustering effectively a no-op. All data is inserted, and 
there are no partial updates. A fully specified row with timestamp 2500 exists 
in the SSTable with a max timestamp of 3000. With a proper row timestamp in 
hand, we can easily ignore the SSTables w/ max timestamps of 1000 and 2000. 
Without it, we read 3 SSTables instead of 1, which likely means a significant 
performance regression. 

The following test illustrates this difference in behavior between 2.1 and 3.0:
https://github.com/maedhroz/cassandra/commit/84ce9242bedd735ca79d4f06007d127de6a82800

A solution here might be as simple as having 
{{SinglePartitionReadCommand#canRemoveRow()}} only inspect primary key liveness 
information for non-compact/CQL tables. Tombstones seem to be handled at a 
level above that anyway.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to