[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ekaterina Dimitrova updated CASSANDRA-16852:
--------------------------------------------
    Description: 
As [~adelapena] explained on 
[CASSANDRA-16827|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16827?focusedCommentId=17398060&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17398060],
 the problem might be in the flag _-Dno-build-test=true_ that the multiplexer 
uses to not run _build-test_ in every iteration, relying on that this has 
already been  done by the build task. This is a performance optimisation that 
can be especially effective in fast tests.
It would be ideal to have the initial multiplexer behavior restored, but we can 
always run _ant build-test_ at the beginning of every multiplexer runner while 
still not running it on every iteration. This seems enough to keep the 
multiplexer working but it requires some extra builds and therefore higher 
costs.

The goal of this ticket is to find the root of this failure and fix the 
multiplexer either by restoring its initial flow or adding _ant build-test_ at 
the beginning of every multiplexer runner, if there is no more effective 
solution. 

  was:
As [~adelapena] explained on 
[CASSANDRA-16827|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16827?focusedCommentId=17398060&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17398060],
 the problem might be in the flag _-Dno-build-test=true_ that the multiplexer 
uses to not run _build-test_ in every iteration, relying on that this has 
already been  done by the build task. This is a performance optimisation that 
can be especially effective in fast tests.
It would be ideal to have the initial multiplexer behavior restored, but we can 
always run _ant build-test_ at the beginning of every multiplexer runner while 
still not running it on every iteration. This seems enough to keep the 
multiplexer working but it requires some extra builds and therefore higher 
costs.

The goal of this ticket is to find the route of this failure and fix the 
multiplexer either by restoring its initial flow or adding _ant build-test_ at 
the beginning of every multiplexer runner, if there is no more effective 
solution. 


> testsome fails in the CircleCI multiplexer because the class JStackJUnitTask 
> can't be found
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-16852
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16852
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: CI
>            Reporter: Ekaterina Dimitrova
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 3.11.x
>
>
> As [~adelapena] explained on 
> [CASSANDRA-16827|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16827?focusedCommentId=17398060&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-17398060],
>  the problem might be in the flag _-Dno-build-test=true_ that the multiplexer 
> uses to not run _build-test_ in every iteration, relying on that this has 
> already been  done by the build task. This is a performance optimisation that 
> can be especially effective in fast tests.
> It would be ideal to have the initial multiplexer behavior restored, but we 
> can always run _ant build-test_ at the beginning of every multiplexer runner 
> while still not running it on every iteration. This seems enough to keep the 
> multiplexer working but it requires some extra builds and therefore higher 
> costs.
> The goal of this ticket is to find the root of this failure and fix the 
> multiplexer either by restoring its initial flow or adding _ant build-test_ 
> at the beginning of every multiplexer runner, if there is no more effective 
> solution. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to