[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17444108#comment-17444108
]
Ekaterina Dimitrova commented on CASSANDRA-16630:
-------------------------------------------------
Thank you for your response [~azotcsit] , I am not saying this ticket is a
blocker but I was more curious where do we stand on this one and how it will
work with Java 17.
It seems only JUnit 5 is already on track with Java 17 so it will be on us to
figure out how to deal with JUnit 4 and what issues will pop up as it is
obsolete.
If you try to run ant and Java17 you will need to update it to a newer version,
heads up.
Also, we haven't migrated yet from nashorn to support the <script> tag of ant
so you might want to comment that part in build.xml
I plan to open a ticket for Nashorn this or next week but first trying to
complete other open topics I have to reduce the context switching and serialize
a bit things. :)
> Migrate to JUnit5
> -----------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-16630
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-16630
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Test/unit
> Reporter: Aleksei Zotov
> Assignee: Aleksei Zotov
> Priority: Low
>
> h3. Overview
> Currently C* uses JUnit4 (version 4.12) which is obsolete. There is a newer
> version 4.13.2 which we could update to. However, JUnit4 is generally
> considered to be outdated and it is reasonable to migrate to JUnit5.
> Despite of having a syntax sugar in JUnit5 (assertThrow, lamda's support,
> ect), there are no blockers that push us to move from JUnit4. The main
> motivation for this initiative is rule of thumb to use up-to-date versions of
> the dependencies.
> Obviously this change is not backward compatible with the open PRs and
> previous C* versions. Therefore, it will require an additional effort for
> backporting the changes and updating PRs that have tests. However, I believe
> it should not be a blocker for this initiative.
> h3. Scope (preliminary list)
> # change JUnit4 to JUnit5 dependencies and make necessary changes in ant
> tasks (https://ant.apache.org/manual/Tasks/junitlauncher.html)
> # update syntax in all tests (imports, Before/After annotations, etc)
> # update parameterized tests
> # create a new version of {{OrderedJUnit4ClassRunner}} and update
> corresponding tests
> # update tests that use {{BMUnitRunner}} (as per
> https://developer.jboss.org/docs/DOC-52953 it supports JUnit5)
> # update tests with {{@Rule}}
> # update tests with expected exceptions
> # update {{JStackJUnitTask}}
> # update formatters
> # create a separate ticket to migrate to {{ant-junitlauncher-1.10.11}} (once
> it is released) and simplify {{JStackJUnitTask}} after
> https://github.com/apache/ant/pull/147
> h3. Order of operations
> In order to make the transition more smooth we want to use a phased approach:
> # migrate to JUnit5 with [Vintage
> Engine|https://junit.org/junit5/docs/current/user-guide/#dependency-metadata-junit-vintage],
> so all JUnit4 tests work as is
> # update tests in a few bunches (to not have a huge single PR with numerous
> conflicts)
> # disable (remove dependency) Vintage Engine, so only JUnit5 tests work
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
