[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17445698#comment-17445698
 ] 

Berenguer Blasi edited comment on CASSANDRA-17072 at 11/18/21, 7:43 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------------

The CI runs SHAs don't match the SHAs on the PRs?

Edit: Sorry for being a pain lol! just trying to connect all the dots


was (Author: bereng):
The CI runs SHAs don't match the SHAs on the PRs?

> DebuggableThreadPoolExecutor does not propagate client warnings
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-17072
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17072
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Local/Other
>            Reporter: Jacek Lewandowski
>            Assignee: Jacek Lewandowski
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.0.x
>
>          Time Spent: 2.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Extracted this as a separate ticket per discussion on CASSANDRA-17044
> The problem is in {{DebuggableThreadPoolExecutor}} - it does not propagate 
> executor locals to the thread when tracing is disabled. It is probably 
> expected that we propagate the state if at least one executor local is 
> defined, but we only check for tracing and completely ignore client warnings.
> The attached PR fixes the problem, adds some tests and reverts a workaround 
> for client warnings in some schema alteration statements implemented in 
> CASSANDRA-16296 (described below).
> ----
> h4. Old description - still valid, but this is just a manifestation of the 
> problem rather than the problem itself
> This seemed to be screwed a bit. In just two schema alteration statements we 
> collect client warnings which are captured during the transformation into a 
> local collection. 
> I guess it is done that way because the transformation is being executed in a 
> different stage (migration) and client warnings collected in that stage are 
> not present in the stage where the query is executed. 
> Then, the client warnings are retrieved using {{clientWarnings}} method and 
> added to the captured client warnings in the stage which is executing the 
> query. 
> This mechanism was implemented only in two schema alteration statements. It 
> is possible that for other ones the client warnings can simply get lost.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to