[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

David Capwell updated CASSANDRA-15399:
--------------------------------------
    Test and Documentation Plan: tests
                         Status: Patch Available  (was: In Progress)

> Add ability to track state in repair
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-15399
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-15399
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Consistency/Repair
>            Reporter: David Capwell
>            Assignee: David Capwell
>            Priority: Normal
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> To enhance the visibility in repair, we should expose internal state via 
> virtual tables; the state should include coordinator as well as participant 
> state (validation, sync, etc.)
> I propose the following tables:
> repairs - high level summary of the global state of repair; this should be 
> called on the coordinator.
> {code:sql}
> CREATE TABLE repairs (
>   id uuid,
>   keyspace_name text,
>   table_names frozen<list<text>>,
>   ranges frozen<list<text>>,
>   coordinator text,
>   participants frozen<list<text>>,
>   state text,
>   progress_percentage float,
>   last_updated_at_millis bigint,
>   duration_micro bigint,
>   failure_cause text,
>   PRIMARY KEY ( (id) )
> )
> {code}
> repair_tasks - represents RepairJob and participants state.  This will show 
> if validations are running on participants and the progress they are making; 
> this should be called on the coordinator.
> {code:sql}
> CREATE TABLE repair_tasks (
>   id uuid,
>   session_id uuid,
>   keyspace_name text,
>   table_name text,
>   ranges frozen<list<text>>,
>   coordinator text,
>   participant text,
>   state text,
>   state_description text,
>   progress_percentage float, -- between 0.0 and 100.0
>   last_updated_at_millis bigint,
>   duration_micro bigint,
>   failure_cause text,
>   PRIMARY KEY ( (id), session_id, table_name, participant )
> )
> {code}
> repair_validations - shows the state of the validation task and updated 
> periodically while validation is running; this should be called on the 
> participants.
> {code:sql}
> CREATE TABLE repair_validations (
>   id uuid,
>   session_id uuid,
>   ranges frozen<list<text>>,
>   keyspace_name text,
>   table_name text,
>   initiator text,
>   state text,
>   progress_percentage float,
>   queue_duration_ms bigint,
>   runtime_duration_ms bigint,
>   total_duration_ms bigint,
>   estimated_partitions bigint,
>   partitions_processed bigint,
>   estimated_total_bytes bigint,
>   failure_cause text,
>   PRIMARY KEY ( (id), session_id, table_name )
> )
> {code}
> The main reason for exposing virtual tables rather than exposing through 
> durable tables is to make sure what is exposed is accurate.  In cases of 
> write failures or node failures, the durable tables could become in-accurate 
> and could add edge cases where the repair is not running but the tables say 
> it is; by relying on repair's internal in-memory bookkeeping, these problems 
> go away.
> This jira does not try to solve the following:
> 1) repair resiliency - there are edge cases where repair hits an error and 
> runs forever (at least from nodetool's perspective).
> 2) repair stream tracking - I have not learned the streaming side yet and 
> what I see is multiple implementations exist, so seems like high scope.  My 
> hope is to punt from this jira and tackle separately.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to