[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17495648#comment-17495648
]
Paulo Motta edited comment on CASSANDRA-17292 at 2/21/22, 5:52 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Migrating from the previous to the new configuration layout in the approach
proposed above would be:
* Decide what macro-categories to start with (ie. core.yaml, guardrails.yaml,
features.yaml)
* Assign existing properties to the corresponding macro-category "bucket" and
group them in feature groups separated by a "section header".
The above would already provide a good starting point for new features moving
forward:
* Any new feature must be added to {{features.yaml}} guarded by a feature-flag
unless it's a core feature (must go on {{{}core.yaml{}}}) or a guardrail
{{{}(must go on guardrails.yaml{}}}).
After the new initial grouping is delivered, we can make incremental changes to
the legacy properties via extraction and re-grouping while keeping most of
other new configurations unchanged.
was (Author: paulo):
Migrating from the previous to the new configuration layout in the approach
proposed above would be:
* Decide what macro-categories to start with (ie. core.yaml, guardrails.yaml,
features.yaml)
* Assign existing properties to the corresponding macro-category "bucket" and
group them in feature groups separated by a "section header".
The above would already provide a good starting point for new features moving
forward:
* Any new feature must be added to {{features.yaml}} guarded by a feature-flag
unless it's a core feature (must go on {{{}core.yaml{}}}) or a guardrail
{{{}(must go on guardrails.yaml{}}}).
After the new initial grouping is delivered, we can make incremental changes to
the legacy categories via extraction and re-grouping while keeping most of
other new configurations unchanged.
> Move cassandra.yaml toward a nested structure around major database concepts
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-17292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17292
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Local/Config
> Reporter: Caleb Rackliffe
> Assignee: Caleb Rackliffe
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 5.x
>
>
> Recent mailing list conversation (see "[DISCUSS] Nested YAML configs for new
> features") has made it clear we will gravitate toward appropriately nested
> structures for new parameters in {{cassandra.yaml}}, but from the scattered
> conversation across a few Guardrails tickets (see CASSANDRA-17212 and
> CASSANDRA-17148) and CASSANDRA-15234, there is also a general desire to
> eventually extend this to the rest of {{cassandra.yaml}}. The benefits of
> this change include those we gain by doing it for new features (single point
> of interest for feature documentation, typed configuration objects, logical
> grouping for additional parameters added over time, discoverability, etc.),
> but one a larger scale.
> This may overlap with ongoing work, including the Guardrails epic. Ideally,
> even a rough cut of a design here would allow that to move forward in a
> timely and coherent manner (with less long-term refactoring pain).
> While these would have to be adjusted to CASSANDRA-15234 (probably after it
> merges), there have been two proposals floated already for what this might
> look like:
> From [~maedhroz] -
> https://github.com/maedhroz/cassandra/commit/450b920e0ac072cec635e0ebcb63538ee7f1fc5a
> From [~benedict] -
> https://github.com/belliottsmith/cassandra/commits/CASSANDRA-15234-grouping-ideas
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
