[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17557980#comment-17557980
 ] 

Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-17709:
----------------------------------------------

bq. Wouldn't it be better to remove the textile file and go for the in-tree docs

This makes the most sense to me, but I'm not sure that can be completed in time 
for release, so we may need a contingency plan.

bq. I don't think this should be a 4.1 blocker as it's an existing bug sort to 
speak?

I can see that point, but at the same time I strongly dislike the idea of 
shipping a new major with ancient documentation.  I think I'd rather not ship 
any docs (at least you won't get steered in the wrong direction and can look 
online) if we need more time.

> CQL.textile needs to be made current
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-17709
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17709
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Legacy/CQL
>            Reporter: Brandon Williams
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 4.0.x, 4.1-beta
>
>
> Per CASSANDRA-17570 
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/doc/cql3/CQL.textile is 
> outdated, and the document we ship inside packages, so this should be made 
> current.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to